How to Use Clawdbot + LangWatch to Monitor Your Agents in Production

Rogerio Chaves
Feb 3, 2026
You've deployed AI agents to production, now you need to debug them when things go wrong. But we are in 2026, so why should YOU be the one debugging them? Why not just ask your AI assistant to do it for you? 😄
This post describes how can you setup your AI assistant (running on OpenClaw) to query LangWatch directly, alongside your other observability tools. When a customer reports an issue, you ask your bot. It searches traces, correlates data, and tells you what happened.
The Setup: LangWatch MCP
LangWatch exposes an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that lets AI assistants query your trace data directly. Combined with OpenClaw's mcporter integration, your clawdbot gains access to:
search_traces— Find traces by time range, filters, or contentget_trace— Retrieve full trace details including spansget_analytics— Aggregated metrics and trends
This allows the bot to see also evaluations, costs, metric trends, drilldown and correlate problems in a heartbeat.
Configuration
Add LangWatch to your mcporter config at ~/.openclaw/workspace/config/mcporter.json:
Your clawdbot can now call LangWatch tools via mcporter:
How It Works in Practice
Scenario: Customer Reports Bad Response
You (in Slack): "A customer said our agent gave incorrect pricing info 20 minutes ago. Can you find what happened?"
Clawdbot: Searches traces from the last hour, filters by the customer's session, and returns:
No need to open any dashboard. You asked a question and got an answer.
Scenario: Debugging a Spike in Errors
You: "We're seeing increased error rates in the agent. What's going on?"
Clawdbot: Queries analytics, finds the error distribution, and correlates with trace data:
Scenario: Prompt Injection Attempt
You: "Did we have any security issues today?"
Clawdbot: Filters traces by failed safety evaluations:
Combining with Other Tools
The real power is correlation. Your clawdbot can query multiple sources, for example:
Tool | Purpose | Example Query |
|---|---|---|
LangWatch | Agent traces, LLM calls, evaluations | "Find traces with high latency" |
CloudWatch | Infrastructure logs, Lambda metrics | "Check for errors in the API logs" |
Metabase | Business data, user info | "What's this customer's plan?" |
Grafana | System metrics, dashboards | "What's our p99 latency right now?" |
A debugging session might flow:
LangWatch: Find the problematic trace, identify the weird LLM behavior
CloudWatch: Check if upstream services had issues by looking at AWS infra logs
Metabase: Pull customer context (plan, history, preferences) from the aggregated databases
Clawdbot takes just a couple minutes to synthesizes across all those sources. We've been using it a lot, saves hours of debugging!
Why This Matters
AI agents are hard to debug because the failure modes are subtle. "The model was overloaded" is easy to catch. "The model lost track of context at turn 47 and started hallucinating" is not.
For us, having the bot query LangWatch directly just removed a whole step from debugging. Instead of context-switching between dashboards, copying trace IDs around, and trying to piece things together manually, we just ask and get the full picture. The fact that it can also pull from CloudWatch, Metabase, etc. in the same conversation means you often go from "a customer reported a problem" to "here's exactly what happened and why" in a couple of minutes. Once you get used to it, going back to manual trace hunting feels like a chore.
LangWatch provides observability for AI applications. The MCP server is open source: @langwatch/mcp-server. Check also OpenClaw telemetry integration documented at langwatch.ai/docs/integration/openclaw.

